sexual morality.
Morality
and righteousness is based on intent, love, and in
giving; yet, how
is it that we as humans have come to view the act of sex with a
different set of arbitrary laws?
Specifically pigeonholed as an act
between man and women and with righteousness based on a unsystematic
number of people we have slept with, we as humans have come to bind
society with a set of laws largely advantageous to a group of people
with the other heavily antagonized and chastised: the imbalance
between man and woman.
Sex
is a powerful act of intent to create: the creation of pleasure,
creation of love, and ultimately the creation of life. It connects
and syncs two beings emotionally, physically, and mentally and is the
strongest expression of love that exists in this World. The Buddha
advised personal conviction as to how his followers should uphold
themselves in personal relationships rather than with specific
commandments based on relationship because every relationship is
highly individualistic and such a varying experience, to where one
binding law wouldn’t be able to educate for the many variables of
intimate relationships.
Whether
between man and women, man and man, or woman and woman; love is your
own personal choice, and love is the only language that is understood
universally. Before any laws created by man, religion, and culture;
the universe has always held us under the morals of love. Is it with
the right intent? Is it based on giving? Is it based on love?
Namaste,
Forrest
Curran
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario